Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Dakota

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living

Spearfish, SD · ~81 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
44.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living runs at 1158% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living: 44.0 TCR = 1158% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living safety composite

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 44.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 46.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living: 38.9 → 56.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 56.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2022

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living's TCR rose 17.4 from 38.9 in 2020 to 56.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Spearfish, SD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 44.0 · 1158% of ind

  • DART 51.9 DART
  • RANK #12/12
  • PHOTO Carlton Senior Livin…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carlton Senior Living Davis (14.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living averages 44.0 TCR (1158% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living TCR series: 2020=38.9 · 2021=49.1 · 2022=56.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 12 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Dakota.

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living (81 employees, TCR 44.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 01020304050 Average employees Total Case Rate Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living
Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living (81 employees, TCR 44.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Edgewood Spearfish Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 56.3 51.9 6 32 0
2021 49.1 46.0 7 25 0
2020 38.9 36.1 4 24 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SD · Spearfish

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,778 rated employers in South Dakota with headcount on file · 26 employers in Spearfish, SD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carlton Senior Living Davis 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Residence of Fosston 29.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chandler Place Independent Living 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sands Wall Systems, Inc. 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE RDU, LLC dba Boyds Gunstock Industries 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sioux Falls Branch 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Regional Health Custer Hospital 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1543 399 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1543 356 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monument Health Spearfish Hospital 300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Regional Health Spearfish Hospital 285 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG246 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zeigler Elkhart 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sentara Resource Pool - Williamsburg 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seaberg Industries 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.