Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living

Edmonds, WA · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living: 10.0 TCR = 263% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living safety composite

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living: 4.7 → 6.0 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 22.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2022

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living's TCR rose 1.3 from 4.7 in 2016 to 6.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 22.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Edmonds, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 263% of ind

  • DART 6.0 DART
  • RANK #111/216
  • PHOTO FM Grande, LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FM Grande, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edmonds Landing Assisted Living averages 10.0 TCR (263% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=13.7 · 2018=22.1 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=8 · 2022=6 · BLS 3.8

Where Edmonds Landing Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living (52 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Edmonds Landing Assisted Living
Edmonds Landing Assisted Living (52 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Edmonds Landing Assisted Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.0 6.0 2 0 0
2021 8.0 8.0 3 0 0
2020 13.1 13.1 2 2 0
2019 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2018 22.1 8.3 8 0 0
2017 13.7 13.7 5 0 0
2016 4.7 4.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Edmonds

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 46 employers in Edmonds, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FM Grande, LLC 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR KN-HHH2-SPRING ARBOR KINSTON 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-X Brighton LLC 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Lakewood 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Naches Heights 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willamette Egg Farms Moses Lake 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Troutlodge 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE FV Frontier Spirit 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000230 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHS, Edmonds Campus 1,387 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCC Community Markets - Edmonds 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR PCC Community Markets Edmonds 148 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Fairfield Fire Department 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 182612-Dub-West Side Anx 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 253933-Grr-Northeast Br 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 479513-Mem-Hickory Hill 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heartis Arlington 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Oaks 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakdale Bldg 504 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE UT01-Salt Lake City 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.