Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Heartis Arlington

Arlington, TX · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartis Arlington runs at 373% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Heartis Arlington: 14.2 TCR = 373% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartis Arlington safety composite

Heartis Arlington scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−70.3

2016→2022

Heartis Arlington injury rate improved

Heartis Arlington's TCR fell 70.3 from 76.9 in 2016 to 6.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 76.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=76.9 · 2017=12.7 · 2018=16.5 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=25.6 · 2021=20.2 · 2022=6.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Arlington, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.2 · 373% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #430/470
  • PHOTO The Conservatory at …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Conservatory at Alden Bridge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Heartis Arlington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartis Arlington averages 14.2 TCR (373% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartis Arlington TCR series: 2016=76.9 · 2017=12.7 · 2018=16.5 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=25.6 · 2021=20.2 · 2022=6.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Heartis Arlington falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #430 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Heartis Arlington (52 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartis Arlington
Heartis Arlington (52 employees, TCR 14.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Heartis Arlington has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.6 6.6 1 2 0
2021 20.2 20.2 5 5 0
2020 25.6 6.4 3 9 0
2019 3.3 0.0 1 1 0
2018 16.5 7.1 7 0 0
2017 12.7 6.3 3 1 0
2016 76.9 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Arlington

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 475 employers in Arlington, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Conservatory at Alden Bridge 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Monticello 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABBY LAFAYETTE LLC 14.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Midland 14.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE KR SGHS 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cactus Feeders 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hale Center Feedyard 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Idalou Egg Ranch LP 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Arlington Assembly 4,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Arlington Warehouse 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Arlington 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health Physician Group 3,831 FTE
NAT-TCR Baxley 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0034-0034-00780 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0032-0032-02702 14.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Magic City Enterprises, Inc. 14.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Edmonds Landing Assisted Living 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bellingham at Orchard A Memory Care Residence 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE IEDS National Hostling LLC 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oakdale Bldg 504 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.