Electrolytic conductivity instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing · Minnesota

Oakdale Bldg 504

Name: Oakdale Bldg 504 Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Oakdale, MN · ~52 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oakdale Bldg 504 runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrolytic conductivity instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Oakdale Bldg 504: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Electrolytic conductivity instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oakdale Bldg 504 safety composite

Oakdale Bldg 504 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Oakdale Bldg 504 held a steady TCR band

Oakdale Bldg 504's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Oakdale, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #1/5
PHOTO Beckman Coulter San …
BOOK 6y book
INJ 0 inj
SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beckman Coulter San Jose (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.5
Beckman Coulte

0.5
bioMerieux Sal

0.5
ACEA San Diego

0.5
ADD-SC Hematol

0.5

What this shows Oakdale Bldg 504 averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Electrolytic conductivity instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Oakdale Bldg 504 TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Oakdale Bldg 504 falls in its industry

213 Electrolytic conductivity inst establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 5 Electrolytic conductivity inst employers in Minnesota.

Oakdale Bldg 504 (52 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Oakdale Bldg 504 has fewer employees than the Electrolytic conductivity instruments, l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	Illnesses
2022	0.0	0
2021	0.0	0
2020	0.0	0
2019	3.2	2
2018	0.0	0
2017	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · MN · Oakdale

213 Electrolytic conductivity instruments, laboratory-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Oakdale, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Beckman Coulter San Jose	SAN JOSE, CA	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	bioMerieux Salt Lake City Murray	SALT LAKE CITY, UT	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	ACEA San Diego	SAN DIEGO, CA	0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	ADD-SC Hematology	SANTA CLARA, CA	0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Hutchinson Utilities Commission	HUTCHINSON	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Kasella Concrete, Inc.	PIERZ	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Bargen Incorporated	MOUNTAIN LAKE	52 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Sheehy Construction Company	ST. PAUL	52 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Mulcahy Nickolaus LLC	Oakdale	306 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Oakdale - Main Store	Oakdale	270 FTE
CITY-NEAR	11762 Oakdale	Oakdale	231 FTE
CITY-NEAR	MOAK - Oakdale Manufacturing	Oakdale	208 FTE
NAT-TCR	3495-11DA631	Manteno, IL	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Intuitive Surgical Phoneix	Phoenix, AZ	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	PUBLCOOC - AT&T Mobility Services LLC	Pueblo, CO	0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	RG&E East Ave	Rochester, NY	0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	UT01-Salt Lake City	Salt Lake City, UT	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	IEDS National Hostling LLC	Spokane, WA	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Edmonds Landing Assisted Living	Edmonds, WA	52 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Heartis Arlington	Arlington, TX	52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.