Work coats and jackets, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors · Kentucky

Edmonton Sewing

Edmonton, KY · ~116 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edmonton Sewing runs at 255% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Work coats and jackets, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Edmonton Sewing: 8.4 TCR = 255% of Work coats and jackets, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edmonton Sewing safety composite

Edmonton Sewing scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Edmonton Sewing: 5.1 → 8.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 16.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2024

Edmonton Sewing's TCR rose 3.7 from 5.1 in 2016 to 8.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 315220 · Edmonton, KY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 255% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Irvine Sewing
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Irvine Sewing (1.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Edmonton Sewing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edmonton Sewing averages 8.4 TCR (255% of the Work coats and jackets, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Edmonton Sewing TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2017=3 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=9.9 · 2022=11.6 · 2023=16.8 · 2024=8.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Edmonton Sewing falls in its industry

46 Work coats and jackets, men's establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Work coats and jackets, men's employers in Kentucky.

Edmonton Sewing (116 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Edmonton Sewing
Edmonton Sewing (116 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 115 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Edmonton Sewing has more employees than the Work coats and jackets, men's and boys', median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.8 4.9 0 9 0
2023 16.8 10.3 2 16 0
2022 11.6 6.2 2 11 0
2021 9.9 6.0 2 8 0
2020 9.9 6.2 0 8 0
2019 2.3 2.3 0 2 0
2017 3.0 1.0 3 0 0
2016 5.1 3.4 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

315220 · KY · Edmonton

46 Work coats and jackets, men's and boys', cut and sewn from purchased fabric (except apparel contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 7 employers in Edmonton, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Irvine Sewing 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nike Distribution Center 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carhartt 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Houston Distribution Center 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE All Facilities 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eaton Asphalt Paving Inc. 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper - Lexington Container 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kingsford Mfg 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Edmonton Plant 4 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sumitomo Electric Wiring Systems 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metcalfe Health Care Center 104 FTE
CITY-NEAR LifeSkills Metcalfe County Service Center 51 FTE
NAT-TCR XSM 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Portage - Department of Public Safety - Fire Division 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Erie Bronze & Aluminum Company 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Tire - Store 14 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenfield-21 Kenwood Street 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE 711/LAS 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loomis Village 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.