Electrical contractors · Georgia

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc.

Alpharetta, GA · ~88 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. runs at 301% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc.: 8.4 TCR = 301% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. safety composite

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc.: 6.7 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 15.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.57× in 2024

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc.'s TCR rose 3.0 from 6.7 in 2016 to 9.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Alpharetta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.4 · 301% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #125/131
  • PHOTO Electrical Dynamics,…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Electrical Dynamics, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. averages 8.4 TCR (301% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=15.1 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=9.9 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=9.2 · 2024=9.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #125 safest of 131 Electrical contractors employers in Georgia.

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. (88 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc.
Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. (88 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Atlanta Lanehart Electric Co., Inc. has more employees than the Electrical contractors median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.7 4.8 6 0 0
2023 9.2 4.6 6 0 0
2022 6.3 3.8 5 0 0
2021 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2020 9.9 6.9 10 0 0
2019 9.1 7.0 9 0 0
2018 7.7 6.6 7 0 0
2017 15.1 8.8 12 0 0
2016 6.7 2.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · GA · Alpharetta

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 329 employers in Alpharetta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Electrical Dynamics, Inc. 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSI: Lubbock 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grants Pass Office 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eldecon, Inc. 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CVB Industrial Contracting INC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wheeler Services, Inc 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headquarters 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE INTERFACE FLOR LLC KYLE II 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR MarketSource, Inc. 5,905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALPHARETTA, GA 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 20001 2,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS (GAAPR) 1,606 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Portage - Department of Public Safety - Fire Division 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Erie Bronze & Aluminum Company 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Edmonton Sewing 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR XSM 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Unitex Meadow 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allied Mechanical and Electrical 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aegis on Queen Anne at Rodger's Park 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bbb 1200/1250 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.