Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · North Carolina

Edwards, Inc.

Spring Hope, NC · ~534 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Edwards, Inc. runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Edwards, Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 46% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Edwards, Inc. safety composite

Edwards, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2017→2024

Edwards, Inc. injury rate improved

Edwards, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.5 from 1.6 in 2017 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.6 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.0 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Spring Hope, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #45/212
  • PHOTO Air Force One, Inc. …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~534 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Air Force One, Inc. (Support Group & Central Region) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Edwards, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Edwards, Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (46% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Edwards, Inc. TCR series: 2017=1.6 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Edwards, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #45 safest of 212 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in North Carolina.

Edwards, Inc. (534 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Edwards, Inc.
Edwards, Inc. (534 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Edwards, Inc. has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.1 8 0 0
2023 1.1 0.6 7 0 0
2022 1.1 1.0 7 0 0
2021 1.8 1.6 10 0 0
2019 1.0 0.7 6 0 0
2018 2.2 1.6 12 0 0
2017 1.6 1.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NC · Spring Hope

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 5 employers in Spring Hope, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Air Force One, Inc. (Support Group & Central Region) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hooper - WI 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Los Angeles 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay Mechanical 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kimbrell's Furniture 535 FTE
STATE-SIZE Guilford County Department of Social Services - Greensboro 535 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alamance Foods Cedar Crest 532 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNA - Raleigh/Field 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR BARNES FARMING CORP 369 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1461 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR 01461 - STORE # 1461 SPRING HOPE 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Belt Concepts of America 36 FTE
NAT-TCR Aus1-Dwh-Austin Division 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bakery Delite 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AB 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR L.E. Ballance Electrical Service, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Manufacturing - El Paso 534 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Merchandise Warehouse 534 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Castle 534 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deceuninck North America-Monroe 534 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.