Conservation and reclamation agencies · Minnesota

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters

Grand Rapids, MN · ~160 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Conservation and reclamation agencies workplace, earning a grade D.

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters: 4.4 TCR = 138% of Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters safety composite

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2024

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters injury rate improved

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.8 in 2017 to 3.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Grand Rapids, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #30/45
  • PHOTO Mesa Region Six
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~160 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mesa Region Six (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters averages 4.4 TCR (138% of the Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4 · 2024=3.7 · BLS 3.2

Where EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters falls in its industry

413 Conservation and reclamation a establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 45 Conservation and reclamation a employers in Minnesota.

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters (160 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters
EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters (160 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

EI022 - Grand Rapids Headquarters has more employees than the Conservation and reclamation agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.7 0.6 4 2 0
2023 4.0 2.6 5 1 0
2022 4.8 2.0 2 5 0
2021 4.7 2.7 2 5 1
2020 6.6 2.0 7 3 0
2019 4.5 3.2 6 1 1
2018 2.2 1.4 3 0 0
2017 4.8 2.4 7 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · MN · Grand Rapids

413 Conservation and reclamation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 75 employers in Grand Rapids, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mesa Region Six 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington State Dept of Natural Resources - Southeast Region 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRS-Delaware 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park District 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE PW-Transportation Operations 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Entegris-Bloomington 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilbert Plastic Services 160 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daikin Applied - Faribault North 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Itasca Clinic & Hospital 706 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Itasca Clniic & Hospital 665 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1609 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1609 301 FTE
NAT-TCR Preschool University 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR S04313 - Florence Hauling 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Armstrong & Aceves Roofing, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Strohecker Incorporated 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greco and Sons of Wisconsin 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Molex Pinellas Park 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Union Medical Center 160 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jackson & Blanc 160 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.