Construction management, single-family building · Pennsylvania

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc

Lancaster, PA · ~72 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction management, single-family building workplace, earning a grade A.

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc: 1.8 TCR = 47% of Construction management, single-family building BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc safety composite

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc injury rate improved

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc's TCR fell 1.8 from 2.9 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Lancaster, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 47% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #11/39
  • PHOTO SLC-DWH-SALT LAKE CITY
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SLC-DWH-SALT LAKE CITY (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc averages 1.8 TCR (47% of the Construction management, single-family building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.1 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc falls in its industry

976 Construction management, singl establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 39 Construction management, singl employers in Pennsylvania.

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc (72 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc
Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc (72 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Elam G Stoltzfus Jr Inc has more employees than the Construction management, single-family b median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2023 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.5 1.3 0 2 0
2021 2.7 0.0 0 2 0
2020 4.1 2.8 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.4 0.0 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.9 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · PA · Lancaster

976 Construction management, single-family building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SLC-DWH-SALT LAKE CITY 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Timberlake Cabinetry - A Division of American Woodmark 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TYLER DEVELOPMENT CORP 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simplicity Homes - OR 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Esbenshade Mount Joy 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maple Lawn Associates 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Middletown Egg 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ken Davis Mushroom Farms 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Barrelhouse 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Perdue Environmental Contracting Co., Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bedford County Communications Center 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Georgia - Corporate and Distribution 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE LaPerle's IGA 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE 443007-Williamsville | NY | SNY-510 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Pete Delivery Inc 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE GA Facility-KPS Global 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.