Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing · Indiana

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center

Indianapolis, IN · ~4,918 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center: 1.3 TCR = 41% of Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center safety composite

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center held a steady TCR band

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.5 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.5 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #14/24
  • PHOTO Renaissane Lakewood …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~4,918 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Renaissane Lakewood LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center averages 1.3 TCR (41% of the Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical Preparation Man establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 24 Pharmaceutical Preparation Man employers in Indiana.

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center (4,918 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center
Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center (4,918 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Eli Lilly - Lilly Technology Center has more employees than the Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.2 0.6 20 31 0
2017 1.3 0.4 35 35 0
2016 1.5 0.5 32 45 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · IN · Indianapolis

855 Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Renaissane Lakewood LLC 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CONTRACT PHARMACAL CORP 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rand 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DFP Clayton 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Roche Diagnostics Operations 4,924 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS-IL Inspection & Logistics - Corporate 5,037 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indiana University Health Healthcare Associates 5,075 FTE
STATE-SIZE USS Gary Works - Plant 4,744 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Youngstown Location 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ngl Crude Transportation, LLC-Rockies 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR West Penn Allegheny Oncology Network (Wpaon) 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sugar Valley 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Toledo Hospital 4,912 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milford Proving Ground 4,911 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bronson Methodist Hospital 4,909 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medix Staffing Solutions 4,908 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.