Community recreation programs, government · North Carolina

Parks & Recreation

Durham, NC · ~313 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Parks & Recreation runs at 286% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Community recreation programs, government workplace, earning a grade F.

Parks & Recreation: 9.1 TCR = 286% of Community recreation programs, government BLS 3.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Parks & Recreation safety composite

Parks & Recreation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.4

2016→2024

Parks & Recreation injury rate improved

Parks & Recreation's TCR fell 6.4 from 14.2 in 2016 to 7.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.2 · 2017=13.6 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=7.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Durham, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 286% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #14/16
  • PHOTO St. Andrews RC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 118 inj
  • SIZE ~313 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Andrews RC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Parks & Recreation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Parks & Recreation averages 9.1 TCR (286% of the Community recreation programs, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Parks & Recreation TCR series: 2016=14.2 · 2017=13.6 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=6.7 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=7.8 · BLS 3.2

Where Parks & Recreation falls in its industry

413 Community recreation programs, establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 16 Community recreation programs, employers in North Carolina.

Parks & Recreation (313 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Parks & Recreation
Parks & Recreation (313 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Parks & Recreation has more employees than the Community recreation programs, governmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.8 7.2 13 0 0
2023 8.7 5.6 13 1 0
2022 8.1 7.4 12 0 0
2021 6.9 4.8 10 0 0
2020 6.7 6.7 9 0 0
2019 11.2 7.7 19 0 0
2018 5.1 3.8 7 1 0
2017 13.6 9.8 18 0 0
2016 14.2 7.5 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · NC · Durham

413 Community recreation programs, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Andrews RC 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Echo Deep 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guilford County - Bur-Mil Park 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recreation 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pactiv Evergreen Kinston N.C 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Engineered Sintered Components 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE matcor metal fabrication 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2244 - Charlotte Midtown 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR USE 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill CFL - Holly Hill 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR FR & S Inc. d/b/a Pioneer Crossing Landfill 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Falling Water Retirement Community 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Elkhart Pouring Plant 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE KYTC District 12 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winder 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carilion Clinic Giles Community Hospital Co. 04 313 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.