Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Emerald Pond

Durham, NC · ~26 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emerald Pond runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Emerald Pond: 0.9 TCR = 23% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emerald Pond safety composite

Emerald Pond scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Emerald Pond held a steady TCR band

Emerald Pond's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Durham, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/356
  • PHOTO ENSIGN SERVICES INC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ENSIGN SERVICES INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Emerald Pond in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emerald Pond averages 0.9 TCR (23% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emerald Pond TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Emerald Pond falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Emerald Pond (26 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Emerald Pond
Emerald Pond (26 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Emerald Pond has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.2 5.2 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Durham

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ENSIGN SERVICES INC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Appleton 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spencer Place 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Springs Senior Living by Spring Arbor 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE R. A. Wood Farms, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yarbrough Farms LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTH LNM- EST 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Toyota Kentucky - Cafeteria 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Ouachita Baptist Univ-Dining 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sandy Springs PDO 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Modine Manufacturing Company - Grenada LAL 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Empire Distribution 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greeley Place 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chelan 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE MS Cafe Millenium 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.