Parts and accessories dealers, automotive · Minnesota

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc

Oakdale, MN · ~41 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc runs at 310% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Parts and accessories dealers, automotive workplace, earning a grade F.

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc: 10.6 TCR = 310% of Parts and accessories dealers, automotive BLS 3.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc safety composite

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc: 10.7 → 13.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 14.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.25× in 2024

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc's TCR rose 2.7 from 10.7 in 2020 to 13.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 441310 · Oakdale, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 310% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #20/24
  • PHOTO Main Office - 01
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main Office - 01 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc averages 10.6 TCR (310% of the Parts and accessories dealers, automotive BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc TCR series: 2020=10.7 · 2021=14.8 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=13.4 · BLS 3.4

Where Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc falls in its industry

1,258 Parts and accessories dealers, establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 24 Parts and accessories dealers, employers in Minnesota.

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc (41 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 30 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc
Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc (41 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 30 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc has more employees than the Parts and accessories dealers, automotiv median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.4 2.7 5 0 0
2023 5.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 8.5 8.5 3 0 0
2021 14.8 5.9 5 0 0
2020 10.7 7.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

441310 · MN · Oakdale

1,258 Parts and accessories dealers, automotive employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 74 employers in Oakdale, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main Office - 01 10.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PBY NJ Paterson 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PBY OK South Walker 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brock Supply Co. 10.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Farming 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feedmill TW Shop - SE 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hobbs Brigade Energy Services 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wild Rice Electric Cooperative, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mulcahy Nickolaus LLC 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oakdale - Main Store 270 FTE
CITY-NEAR 11762 Oakdale 231 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOAK - Oakdale Manufacturing 208 FTE
NAT-TCR Midnight Munchies, Inc. 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Seaboard Foods Lp Iowa Maint 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Babb Construction Co dba Delta Construction Co 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR TXD037 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE DeCoty Coffee Company - San Angelo 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wood Essence 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammond Lead Products - Hammond Plant 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Specialty Coating Systems Ontario CA 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.