Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing · Georgia

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell

Norcross, GA · ~196 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell safety composite

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell: 0.0 → 0.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2022

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Norcross, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~196 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation Pascagoula Campus (1212) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell falls in its industry

388 Aeronautical systems and instr establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Aeronautical systems and instr employers in Georgia.

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell (196 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell
EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell (196 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

EMS Technologies owned by Honeywell has fewer employees than the Aeronautical systems and instruments man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.8 1.2 2 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · GA · Norcross

388 Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 337 employers in Norcross, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Pascagoula Campus (1212) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR EFW Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR L3 Cincinnati Electronics 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Linkabit Division-Florida 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beasley Timber Company 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Industrial Mechanical, Inc. 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milliken - Valway Plant 196 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solo Cup Company Thomaston 196 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Office 1,234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ole Mexican Foods, Norcross 6585 866 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6585 844 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAPA ATLANTA 794 FTE
NAT-TCR Solar Turbines Incorporated DWSL Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Nalco Water, Green Tree Facility 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Newton Corning (NCP) 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR White Stone 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Village of Lake in the Hills 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lunds & Byerlys, Roseville 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE Felix Construction Company 196 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Century FS 196 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.