Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing · Florida

Linkabit Division-Florida

Name: Linkabit Division-Florida Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Melbourne, FL · ~91 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 0.6
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Linkabit Division-Florida runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Linkabit Division-Florida: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Linkabit Division-Florida safety composite

Linkabit Division-Florida scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers
DART rate: F 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Linkabit Division-Florida: 0.0 → 1.2 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 2.02× in 2017

Linkabit Division-Florida's TCR rose 1.2 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 2.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Melbourne, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

DART 1.2 DART
RANK #17/38
PHOTO L3 Cincinnati Electr…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L3 Cincinnati Electronics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.6
L3 Cincinnati

0.6
Lockheed Marti

0.6
L-3 communicat

0.6
NGMS-F104

0.6

What this shows Linkabit Division-Florida averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Linkabit Division-Florida TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Linkabit Division-Florida falls in its industry

388 Search and detection systems a establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 38 Search and detection systems a employers in Florida.

Linkabit Division-Florida (91 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Linkabit Division-Florida has fewer employees than the Search and detection systems and instrum median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2017	1.2	1.2	1	0	0
2016	0.0	0.0	0	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · FL · Melbourne

388 Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	L3 Cincinnati Electronics	MASON, OH	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Lockheed Martin Corporation Moorestown Campus (1015)	MOORESTOWN, NJ	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	L-3 communications Cincinnati Electronics	MASON, OH	0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	NGMS-F104	MCCLELLAN, CA	0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd. - Farm Direct	WIMAUMA	91 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Crystal River South Fossil Plant	CRYSTAL RIVER	91 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Turkey Point Plant Fossil	FLORIDA CITY	91 FTE
STATE-SIZE	ML3 Brevard Service Center	MELBOURNE	91 FTE
CITY-NEAR	NGAS-A458	Melbourne	4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER	Melbourne	2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Nextech HVACR	Melbourne	2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Health First Medical Group	Melbourne	1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR	Nelson Electric Company	Cedar Rapids, IA	0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	HUNTSVILLE_AL	Huntsville, AL	0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Signode Industrial Products LLC	Glenview, IL	0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	REN450 Brand Standards	Charlotte, NC	0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Legends - Veterans at Virginia Beach	Virginia Beach, VA	91 FTE
NAT-SIZE	GS500 - GSU - Sacramento	Sacramento, CA	91 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Power Services : Erlanger, KY, USA	Erlanger, KY	91 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Jefferson City (Mojef)	Jefferson City, MO	91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.