Letters for signs manufacturing · Missouri

Engraphix Architectural Signage

Saint Louis, MO · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Engraphix Architectural Signage runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Letters for signs manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Engraphix Architectural Signage: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Letters for signs manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Engraphix Architectural Signage safety composite

Engraphix Architectural Signage scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2021

Engraphix Architectural Signage injury rate improved

Engraphix Architectural Signage's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339950 · Saint Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/14
  • PHOTO Sign America, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sign America, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Engraphix Architectural Signage in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Engraphix Architectural Signage averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Letters for signs manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Engraphix Architectural Signage TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Engraphix Architectural Signage falls in its industry

405 Letters for signs manufacturin establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 14 Letters for signs manufacturin employers in Missouri.

Engraphix Architectural Signage (35 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Engraphix Architectural Signage
Engraphix Architectural Signage (35 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Engraphix Architectural Signage has fewer employees than the Letters for signs manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339950 · MO · Saint Louis

405 Letters for signs manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 448 employers in Saint Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sign America, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adams Manufacturing 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Derse Atlanta 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Farmington Displays Inc 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Leadership Team 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations South 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Dorsett District 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Meter Services - UEC 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR MO002 12,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barnes-Jewish Hospital 9,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL ST LOUIS 5,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR Checkerboard Square 3,464 FTE
NAT-TCR Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwire Denton CSC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Laredo Petroleum - Garden City 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dierks 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE De Boer Dairy & Farming 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arc Twin Cities New Hope 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Mechancial & Service Corp Casselberry 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sand Hills 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.