Hotels (except casino hotels) · Minnesota

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn

Maple Grove, MN · ~40 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade A.

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn: 1.4 TCR = 47% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn safety composite

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn held a steady TCR band

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 7.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Maple Grove, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/155
  • PHOTO Hyatt Regency Denver…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hyatt Regency Denver Tech Center - HRDTC Hotel Owner LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn averages 1.4 TCR (47% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 155 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in Minnesota.

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn (40 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn
Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn (40 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Maple Grove Hilton Garden Inn has fewer employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 7.1 7.1 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MN · Maple Grove

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 238 employers in Maple Grove, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hyatt Regency Denver Tech Center - HRDTC Hotel Owner LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crowne Plaza Dulles Airport 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR M2 Oxford Tenant LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Courtyard Ft. Lauderdale Planation 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE FDML TW Shop - SE 0010 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sleepy Eye Feedmill 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forsman Farms HL 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perham Breeders 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific Corporation 5,324 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR MNMPL - MAPLE GROVE 932 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAPLE GROVE (MNMPL) 760 FTE
NAT-TCR Engraphix Architectural Signage 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwire Denton CSC 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Laredo Petroleum - Garden City 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dierks 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gary Division 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lewis Environmental, Inc.- Royersford 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Central Distribution Center 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelbyville, MI 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.