District and regional offices · North Carolina

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399

Charlotte, NC · ~107 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical District and regional offices workplace, earning a grade C.

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399: 0.8 TCR = 109% of District and regional offices BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 safety composite

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2021

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 injury rate improved

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399's TCR fell 1.5 from 1.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.8 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/70
  • PHOTO CORP-VTA-CORPORATE
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CORP-VTA-CORPORATE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 averages 0.8 TCR (109% of the District and regional offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 falls in its industry

1,475 District and regional offices establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 70 District and regional offices employers in North Carolina.

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 (107 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399
Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 (107 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Enterprise Leasing Company SE, LLC - 5399 has fewer employees than the District and regional offices median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.5 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · NC · Charlotte

1,475 District and regional offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CORP-VTA-CORPORATE 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acadia Healthcare 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Les Schwab Headquarters 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Romulus Restaurant Group 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Durham Operations Center 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asheville Operations Center 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE I485 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE C&C Industrial, Inc 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Roy Blackwell Enterprises, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Peter Mangone, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincoln Lodge 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnson & Wood LLC. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Danville Regional Rehabiliation 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Capitol Nursing and Rehabilitation 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Universal Refractories, Inc 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Custom Coolers, Inc. CA 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.