Building cleaning services, janitorial · California

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc

Brea, CA · ~156 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc runs at 192% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade D.

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc: 8.6 TCR = 192% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc safety composite

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2022

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc injury rate improved

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc's TCR fell 2.8 from 11.1 in 2017 to 8.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.1 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=8.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Brea, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 8.6 · 192% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #281/368
  • PHOTO 410680
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 40 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 410680 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc averages 8.6 TCR (192% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc TCR series: 2017=11.1 · 2020=6.1 · 2021=9.1 · 2022=8.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #281 safest of 368 Building cleaning services, ja employers in California.

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc (156 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc
Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc (156 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Environment Control Puente Hills, Inc has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.2 8.2 10 0 0
2021 9.1 3.5 13 0 0
2020 6.1 4.6 8 0 0
2017 11.1 6.1 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · CA · Brea

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 150 employers in Brea, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 410680 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Exterior Building Maintenance Services 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Batch Enterprises, Inc 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR C & P Installations 8.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bud of California Celery 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Foods, Inc. 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Villa Park Strathmore 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packing Plant 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winpin 85C 1,570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brea Distribution Center 1,350 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABS-0029-0028-06758 FAC-06758-BREA-CA 1,143 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 464 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Malog - Logan Airport 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pitkin Elementary School 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HG416 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0020-0022-02756 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE City of Springfield - City Hall 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brandon Lewis Orchards, Inc 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schick Manufacturing Inc. - Knoxville 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE 503 - Manchester-CT 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.