Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · Minnesota

Enzymology Research Center Inc

Miltona, MN · ~58 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Enzymology Research Center Inc runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Enzymology Research Center Inc: 5.7 TCR = 172% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Enzymology Research Center Inc safety composite

Enzymology Research Center Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2018→2022

Enzymology Research Center Inc injury rate improved

Enzymology Research Center Inc's TCR fell 4.1 from 8.7 in 2018 to 4.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=8.7 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Miltona, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 172% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #13/17
  • PHOTO ProTec Laboratories
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ProTec Laboratories (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Enzymology Research Center Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Enzymology Research Center Inc averages 5.7 TCR (172% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Enzymology Research Center Inc TCR series: 2018=8.7 · 2019=4.3 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=4.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Enzymology Research Center Inc falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 17 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in Minnesota.

Enzymology Research Center Inc (58 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Enzymology Research Center Inc
Enzymology Research Center Inc (58 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Enzymology Research Center Inc has fewer employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.6 1.5 3 0 0
2021 4.4 2.9 1 2 0
2020 6.4 3.2 2 2 0
2019 4.3 2.2 2 0 0
2018 8.7 4.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · MN · Miltona

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ProTec Laboratories 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR JOVE Laboratories, LLC. 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parks and Rec Building 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nature's Sunshine- Spanish Fork 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vireo Health of MN - Otsego 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms SE Misc MN 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2101-Redwood Falls, MN (Monsanto Co.) 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home Office 58 FTE
NAT-TCR Cement Products Inc 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR The Woodlands Waterway Marriott 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Rock - Colorado Springs 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0680 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bock Construction 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal Building Supply, inc 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lindsay Precast Stay Right Division 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bergey's Chrysler Jeep Dodge 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.