Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential · California

Epiphany Center

San Francisco, CA · ~53 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Epiphany Center runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential workplace, earning a grade F.

Epiphany Center: 13.4 TCR = 353% of Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Epiphany Center safety composite

Epiphany Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Epiphany Center: 7.9 → 17.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 17.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2024

Epiphany Center's TCR rose 9.6 from 7.9 in 2018 to 17.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.4 · 353% of ind

  • DART 11.6 DART
  • RANK #155/177
  • PHOTO 03-110 STOCKTON ARC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 03-110 STOCKTON ARC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Epiphany Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Epiphany Center averages 13.4 TCR (353% of the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Epiphany Center TCR series: 2018=7.9 · 2019=10.6 · 2022=17.8 · 2024=17.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Epiphany Center falls in its industry

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 177 Drug addiction rehabilitation employers in California.

Epiphany Center (53 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Epiphany Center
Epiphany Center (53 employees, TCR 13.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Epiphany Center has fewer employees than the Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 17.4 11.6 9 0 0
2022 17.8 17.8 6 1 0
2019 10.6 5.3 4 0 0
2018 7.9 7.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · CA · San Francisco

1,165 Drug addiction rehabilitation facilities (except licensed hospitals), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 03-110 STOCKTON ARC 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR INCAMB-O-D-RW CAMBRIDGE CITY 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR LA - 12423 Dahlia Ave, EM 13.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summitview Child and Family Services, Inc. 13.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE LRC LABOR SERVICES INC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acemi Nursery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ball Tagawa Growers 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Clark 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 401 Oregon Foods Systems 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tristeel Manufacturing - GF 13.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sycamore Run 13.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE McCarthy Building Companies, Inc. - Southern Region Atlanta Office 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scott County Community Sheltered Workshop 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bill Jacobs Volkswagen 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABC Bus Companies 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.