Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) · Pennsylvania

ERC of PA

Lancaster, PA · ~87 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ERC of PA runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) workplace, earning a grade D.

ERC of PA: 4.9 TCR = 190% of Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) BLS 2.6 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ERC of PA safety composite

ERC of PA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2020

ERC of PA injury rate improved

ERC of PA's TCR fell 0.7 from 5.0 in 2017 to 4.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.0 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562219 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 190% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Stericycle - Vernon,CA
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stericycle - Vernon,CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

ERC of PA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ERC of PA averages 4.9 TCR (190% of the Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ERC of PA TCR series: 2017=5 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=4.2 · BLS 2.6

Where ERC of PA falls in its industry

171 Nonhazardous waste treatment a establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Nonhazardous waste treatment a employers in Pennsylvania.

ERC of PA (87 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate ERC of PA
ERC of PA (87 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 4.9

ERC of PA has more employees than the Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.2 4.2 3 0 0
2019 5.6 2.8 5 1 0
2017 5.0 5.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562219 · PA · Lancaster

171 Nonhazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities (except combustors, incinerators, landfills, sewer systems, sewage treatment facilities) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stericycle - Vernon,CA 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stericycle - Baltimore,MD-5901 Chemical 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stericycle - St. Louis,MO 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Earth of Connecticut 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Adams County Nursery Inc 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Handwerk Site Contractors 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1400 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE David M. Maines Associates, Inc. 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Roses 558 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FFD-Hermitage, LLC (dba Famous Dave`s) 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1969-FSL1 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Grubb Ventures 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Envoy of Woodbridge 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Motor Carrier Service LLC 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ortronics, Inc 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fondomonte Vicksburg Farm 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.