Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing · New York

Erdle Perforating - Rochester

Rochester, NY · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Erdle Perforating - Rochester runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Erdle Perforating - Rochester: 4.5 TCR = 135% of Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Erdle Perforating - Rochester safety composite

Erdle Perforating - Rochester scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2022→2024

Erdle Perforating - Rochester injury rate improved

Erdle Perforating - Rochester's TCR fell 3.7 from 5.6 in 2022 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.6 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 135% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/19
  • PHOTO Ditron
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ditron (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Erdle Perforating - Rochester in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Erdle Perforating - Rochester averages 4.5 TCR (135% of the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Erdle Perforating - Rochester TCR series: 2022=5.6 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Erdle Perforating - Rochester falls in its industry

477 Metal stampings (except automo establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 19 Metal stampings (except automo employers in New York.

Erdle Perforating - Rochester (54 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Erdle Perforating - Rochester
Erdle Perforating - Rochester (54 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Erdle Perforating - Rochester has fewer employees than the Metal stampings (except automotive, cans median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 5.9 4.0 3 0 0
2022 5.6 3.7 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · NY · Rochester

477 Metal stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ditron 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Resource, Inc. CT Division 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KMC Stampings - Mineral Springs 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lincoln Dairy 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kast Farms Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roseton Generating LLC 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE W. 30th Street Substation 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Bayou Processing & Storage, LP 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR McQuade Distributing Co., Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnes Healthcare Services - Gainesville 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Current Electric Company 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE The National WWI Museum and Memorial 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE PMP Fermentation Products, Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Breakthru Beverage Florida - Pensacola 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alpha Insulation Nashville 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.