Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing

Germantown, WI · ~105 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing runs at 135% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing: 4.5 TCR = 135% of Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing safety composite

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing: 1.9 → 7.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing's TCR rose 5.2 from 1.9 in 2021 to 7.1 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332119 · Germantown, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 135% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #20/61
  • PHOTO Ditron
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ditron (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing averages 4.5 TCR (135% of the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing TCR series: 2021=1.9 · 2022=7.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing falls in its industry

477 Stampings (except automotive, establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 61 Stampings (except automotive, employers in Wisconsin.

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing (105 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing
Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing (105 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Wisconsin Stamping and Manufacturing has more employees than the Stampings (except automotive, cans, coin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.1 0.0 5 2 0
2021 1.9 0.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332119 · WI · Germantown

477 Stampings (except automotive, cans, coins), metal, unfinished, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 112 employers in Germantown, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ditron 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Erdle Perforating - Rochester 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Resource, Inc. CT Division 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR KMC Stampings - Mineral Springs 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Koppers KRS Field Services 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ahern Menomonie (NW) 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Horner Plumbing Co., INC. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nortera Foods Fairwater 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellsworth Corporation - Germantown, Wisconsin 428 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1515 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1515 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weimer Bearing & Transmission, Inc. 353 FTE
NAT-TCR P&M Brick LLC. 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100044 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fremont Plant 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR BASF Corporation - Converse 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rockford Process Control 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compassionate Community Care 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100091 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100057 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.