Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Wisconsin

Essentia Health Ashland clinic

Ashland, WI · ~86 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Essentia Health Ashland clinic runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade C.

Essentia Health Ashland clinic: 4.4 TCR = 115% of Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Essentia Health Ashland clinic safety composite

Essentia Health Ashland clinic scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2017

Essentia Health Ashland clinic injury rate improved

Essentia Health Ashland clinic's TCR fell 2.8 from 5.8 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Ashland, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 115% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #42/60
  • PHOTO Lake Cumberland Rheu…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lake Cumberland Rheumatology, PLLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Essentia Health Ashland clinic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Essentia Health Ashland clinic averages 4.4 TCR (115% of the Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Essentia Health Ashland clinic TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=3 · BLS 3.8

Where Essentia Health Ashland clinic falls in its industry

2,836 Physicians' (except mental hea establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 60 Physicians' (except mental hea employers in Wisconsin.

Essentia Health Ashland clinic (86 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Essentia Health Ashland clinic
Essentia Health Ashland clinic (86 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Essentia Health Ashland clinic has more employees than the Physicians' (except mental health) offic median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.0 0.0 2 0 0
2016 5.8 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · WI · Ashland

2,836 Physicians' (except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 38 employers in Ashland, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lake Cumberland Rheumatology, PLLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Specialty Retina Center, LLC 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FV Clinics-Apple Valley IAM 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FV Clinics-Fridley Clinic 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE SPA:SP001 - SP001-Tjader-New Richmond, WI 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terminal-Andrae, LLC 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE BelGioioso Cheese - Glenmore 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blair 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Medical Center 458 FTE
CITY-NEAR C. G. Bretting Manufacturing Company Inc. 412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northern Clearing Inc. 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1672 247 FTE
NAT-TCR 0140 - Harrisburg, Pa 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Georgia Tech Hotel and Conference Center 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Upsco Airline Hangar (Kyalh) 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Seagoville 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE N and R of Eldon Inc 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100533 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Historic Tours of America, Inc. - Corporate 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE FDC St. Louis 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.