Rod, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants · Indiana

Essex Group, Inc

Columbia City, IN · ~63 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Essex Group, Inc runs at 204% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Rod, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants workplace, earning a grade F.

Essex Group, Inc: 6.7 TCR = 204% of Rod, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Essex Group, Inc safety composite

Essex Group, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2018

Essex Group, Inc injury rate improved

Essex Group, Inc's TCR fell 1.2 from 7.3 in 2016 to 6.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2018=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331420 · Columbia City, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.7 · 204% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #19/23
  • PHOTO Bayway Operations
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bayway Operations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Essex Group, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Essex Group, Inc averages 6.7 TCR (204% of the Rod, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Essex Group, Inc TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2018=6.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Essex Group, Inc falls in its industry

198 Rod, copper and copper alloy, establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 23 Rod, copper and copper alloy, employers in Indiana.

Essex Group, Inc (63 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Essex Group, Inc
Essex Group, Inc (63 employees, TCR 6.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Essex Group, Inc has fewer employees than the Rod, copper and copper alloy, made from median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.1 3.1 4 0 0
2016 7.3 4.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331420 · IN · Columbia City

198 Rod, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 67 employers in Columbia City, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bayway Operations 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fisk Alloy Conductor 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Astroseal Products Mfg. Corp. 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Therm-O-Link 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Total Seed Production 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Johnson County REMC 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Loren Wood Builders 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLTurner 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail 944 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics Structural & Rail Division 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lear Corporation - Columbia City 529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Undersea Sensor Systems Inc 527 FTE
NAT-TCR San Antonio (Txlop) 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lawton (Oklaw) 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Omegasea LLC 6.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sonesta Coconut Grove 6.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Piper Plastic Illinois 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodward Printing Services/GIL Shopping News 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cascades Tissue Group North Carolina - Rockingham 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE RAFS of Pensacola, Inc 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.