Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · California

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant

Herald, CA · ~21 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant: 0.6 TCR = 47% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant safety composite

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant held a steady TCR band

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Herald, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/41
  • PHOTO Major Oak Power
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Major Oak Power (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant averages 0.6 TCR (47% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 41 Electric power generation, fos employers in California.

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant (21 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant
EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant (21 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · CA · Herald

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Major Oak Power 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regulated Fossil Support 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mayo Fossil Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRG Will County Generating Station 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rancho Seco Recreation Area 25 FTE
NAT-TCR Bank of Tennessee 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Paslin, Ryan 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 900 Freedom Work Opportunities, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Weld Mold Company 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blue Ridge Graphics 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Soileau Industries, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Polyfiber 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.