Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers · Wisconsin
Eutectic Corporation
MENOMONEE FALLS, WI · ~88 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 4.2
- Avg TCR
- 2.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Eutectic Corporation runs at 190% of its industry's injury rate — more dangerous than the typical Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers workplace — earning a grade D.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 4.2
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 2.2
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 20
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Eutectic Corporation's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 6 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
Eutectic Corporation's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 2.2 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 423840.
Eutectic Corporation has an average TCR of 4.2, which is 190% of the industry average (2.2) for Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers. This is worse than average.
Safety Insights for Eutectic Corporation
Eutectic Corporation operates an establishment with approximately 88 full-time equivalent workers in MENOMONEE FALLS, WI, classified under the Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers industry (NAICS 423840). Across 6 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 20 recordable injuries, 2 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the D letter grade (Poor Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 2.2 for Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers, Eutectic Corporation's workforce experiences 190% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR above the benchmark flags a higher-than-typical risk profile for jobseekers, insurers, and enforcement agencies to examine.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 6 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Eutectic Corporation as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Eutectic Corporation's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 423840 — Welding supplies (except welding gases) merchant wholesalers.
DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 90,915 hours worked = 2.20 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Eutectic Corporation (this establishment) | 4.18 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 6-year avg |
| 5085 industry avg | 2.20 | BLS IIF, NAICS 423840 |
| Wisconsin state avg (all industries) | 4.92 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Eutectic Corporation to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 7 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2021: 1 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 4 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 7 reportable incidents · 7 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities — OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 8.1 | 5.8 | 6 | 1 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3.9 | 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7.5 | 3.2 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Eutectic Corporation's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has Eutectic Corporation reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.