Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing · Kansas

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp.

Galena, KS · ~115 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp.: 2.2 TCR = 68% of Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. safety composite

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp.: 1.7 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp.'s TCR rose 0.8 from 1.7 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.5 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325199 · Galena, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Arch Chemicals Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arch Chemicals Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. averages 2.2 TCR (68% of the Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. TCR series: 2016=1.7 · 2017=2.5 · 2018=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. falls in its industry

552 Carbon organic compounds, not establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Carbon organic compounds, not employers in Kansas.

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. (115 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp.
Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. (115 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Evonik jayhawk fine chemicals corp. has more employees than the Carbon organic compounds, not specified median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.5 0.0 3 0 0
2017 2.5 1.7 2 1 0
2016 1.7 1.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325199 · KS · Galena

552 Carbon organic compounds, not specified elsewhere by process, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 12 employers in Galena, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arch Chemicals Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aldrich Chemical Co., LLC - Sheboygan 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SantoLubes Manufacturing LLC 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR REG New Boston 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nowak Construction Co., Inc. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Williams Foods 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Global Engineering & Technology, Inc. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Star Lumber Truss Wichita 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jayhawk Fine Chemicals 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Republic Services of Galena 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4393 Galena 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Galena Nursing Center 55 FTE
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #791 (Forest City, IA) 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Property Management - Parks and Recreation 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hayes Manufacturing, Inc 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Covanta Honolulu Resource Recovery Venture, LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Installation Professionals 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comfort Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harmony Hall Nursing and Rehabilitation 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Microboard Processing, Inc. 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.