Executive and legislative office combinations · South Carolina

Anderson County Government

Anderson, SC · ~1,093 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anderson County Government runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Executive and legislative office combinations workplace, earning a grade D.

Anderson County Government: 6.4 TCR = 200% of Executive and legislative office combinations BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anderson County Government safety composite

Anderson County Government scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Anderson County Government: 7.4 → 58.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 58.0 TCR · DART/TCR 3.13× in 2023

Anderson County Government's TCR rose 50.6 from 7.4 in 2017 to 58.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 3.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · Anderson, SC ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 200% of ind

  • DART 20.0 DART
  • RANK #22/28
  • PHOTO City of Coralville
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 345 inj
  • SIZE ~1,093 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Coralville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Anderson County Government in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anderson County Government averages 6.4 TCR (200% of the Executive and legislative office combinations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anderson County Government TCR series: 2017=7.4 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=7.3 · 2020=4.8 · 2021=5 · 2023=58 · BLS 3.2

Where Anderson County Government falls in its industry

239 Executive and legislative offi establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 28 Executive and legislative offi employers in South Carolina.

Anderson County Government (1,093 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Anderson County Government
Anderson County Government (1,093 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Anderson County Government has more employees than the Executive and legislative office combina median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 58.0 20.0 55 3 0
2021 5.0 1.6 47 0 0
2020 4.8 1.3 46 1 0
2019 7.3 1.0 67 0 0
2018 7.5 1.2 68 0 0
2017 7.4 1.8 62 3 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · SC · Anderson

239 Executive and legislative office combinations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 167 employers in Anderson, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Coralville 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greene County Government 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CITY OF EAGLE LAKE 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR FIRE ACADEMY 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Utility Partners of America 1,095 FTE
STATE-SIZE SCCAH - COLUMBIA AIR HUB 1,095 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michelin Americas Research Center - MARC 1,101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nestle Prepared Frozen Foods 1,103 FTE
CITY-NEAR AnMed Medical Center 2,374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anmed Health Medical Center 1,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bosch AdP 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdP 1,314 FTE
NAT-TCR Wisconsin Precision Casting 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Machining and Welding by Olsen Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Save Eleele 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Impact Industries, Inc. 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 356886-Queens Ny P&Dc 1,093 FTE
NAT-SIZE CITGO Petroleum Corporation 1,093 FTE
NAT-SIZE ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Houston Campus 1,093 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon Transportation Services : DAL9 1,093 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.