Bus operation, school and employee · Connecticut

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance

East Hartford, CT · ~22 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance runs at 218% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Bus operation, school and employee workplace, earning a grade F.

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance: 9.8 TCR = 218% of Bus operation, school and employee BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance safety composite

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance: 8.3 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 51.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.26× in 2022

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance's TCR rose 4.2 from 8.3 in 2016 to 12.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 51.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485410 · East Hartford, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 218% of ind

  • DART 12.4 DART
  • RANK #110/113
  • PHOTO 20956 Charleston Are…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 20956 Charleston Area-C (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance averages 9.8 TCR (218% of the Bus operation, school and employee BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance TCR series: 2016=8.3 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=51.9 · 2020=7.9 · 2021=15.9 · 2022=12.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance falls in its industry

1,574 Bus operation, school and empl establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #110 safest of 113 Bus operation, school and empl employers in Connecticut.

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance (22 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance
Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance (22 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Facilities - Custodial and Maintenance has fewer employees than the Bus operation, school and employee median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 12.4 12.4 4 0 0
2021 15.9 15.9 2 0 0
2020 7.9 0.0 0 1 0
2019 51.9 51.9 5 1 0
2018 10.3 10.3 1 0 0
2017 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2016 8.3 4.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485410 · CT · East Hartford

1,574 Bus operation, school and employee employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 119 employers in East Hartford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 20956 Charleston Area-C 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MSD of Pike Township Transportation 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transportation 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 143019-Long Beach | CA | MST-100 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charles River Avian Norwich 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Towantic 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Kleen 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water & Sewer - Spring St. 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pratt & Whitney East Hartford 9,837 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cyient, Inc. 1,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cyient, Inc (US combined) 1,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR DDS North Region 755 FTE
NAT-TCR Tops #723 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR CLS Construction Services, Inc. 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR LivGenerations Ahwatukee 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Hamilton Wolfe 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 00394-SR69 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 00394-SR66 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE RAM Pest Management 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastside Packing, Inc. 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.