Jet engine components · Connecticut

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford

East Hartford, CT · ~9,837 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Jet engine components workplace, earning a grade A.

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Jet engine components BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford safety composite

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford injury rate improved

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.9 in 2016 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.9 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · East Hartford, CT AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #1/54
  • PHOTO Qualiseal Technology
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 303 inj
  • SIZE ~9,837 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Qualiseal Technology (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pratt & Whitney East Hartford averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Jet engine components BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=0.4 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Pratt & Whitney East Hartford falls in its industry

366 Jet engine components establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 54 Jet engine components employers in Connecticut.

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford (9,837 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Pratt & Whitney East Hartford
Pratt & Whitney East Hartford (9,837 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Pratt & Whitney East Hartford has more employees than the Jet engine components median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.1 31 8 0
2023 0.3 0.1 17 9 0
2022 0.3 0.1 25 13 0
2021 0.4 0.2 34 6 0
2020 0.3 0.1 28 3 0
2019 0.2 0.1 25 3 0
2018 0.4 0.2 41 1 0
2017 0.5 0.2 36 10 0
2016 0.9 0.7 66 13 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · CT · East Hartford

366 Jet engine components employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 119 employers in East Hartford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Qualiseal Technology 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls Royce: Excellence 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Greenville, SC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rhinestahl CTS 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE HARTFORD HOSPITAL 7,842 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Dynamics Electric Boat 12,075 FTE
STATE-SIZE University of Connecticut, Storrs 12,616 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US CT Stratford Main St (5225) 6,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cyient, Inc. 1,228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cyient, Inc (US combined) 1,074 FTE
CITY-NEAR DDS North Region 755 FTE
CITY-NEAR United Technologies Research Center 619 FTE
NAT-TCR Pasadena Power Plant 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR City Hall 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Al Tom Forest Products, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Admin/Sales - ARCo 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
NAT-SIZE UK Healthcare 9,922 FTE
NAT-SIZE UC Los Angeles Health 9,727 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.