Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · California

Facility Builders & Erectors

Anaheim, CA · ~59 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Facility Builders & Erectors runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade F.

Facility Builders & Erectors: 6.6 TCR = 228% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Facility Builders & Erectors safety composite

Facility Builders & Erectors scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2017→2019

Facility Builders & Erectors injury rate improved

Facility Builders & Erectors's TCR fell 6.5 from 11.4 in 2017 to 4.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Anaheim, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.6 · 228% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #415/486
  • PHOTO EM Precision,LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EM Precision,LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Facility Builders & Erectors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Facility Builders & Erectors averages 6.6 TCR (228% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Facility Builders & Erectors TCR series: 2017=11.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=4.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Facility Builders & Erectors falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #415 safest of 486 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

Facility Builders & Erectors (59 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Facility Builders & Erectors
Facility Builders & Erectors (59 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Facility Builders & Erectors has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2017 11.4 9.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Anaheim

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 630 employers in Anaheim, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EM Precision,LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northeast Agri Systems 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caliber Construction, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Recreational Design & Construction, Inc. 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE DFFF-Salinas 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE LOMA 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.R. AG SOLUTIONS, INC. 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE F&J FERNANDEZ CONTRACTING 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., dba Disneyland Resort 38,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. d/b/a Disneyland Resort 28,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Doubletree By Hilton Suites Anaheim 1,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08881053 ORANGE CO ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER 1,658 FTE
NAT-TCR SMT Lines - DAL 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR M.S. Iron Works, Inc. 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CLS 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR McColl Store 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE PC-01 and PC-96 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garage Graphics and Visuals dba Elemoose 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE JM Tungste-Met 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE HoneywellTN23 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.