Hotels (except casino hotels) · New York

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square

New York, NY · ~51 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade D.

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square: 4.9 TCR = 165% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square safety composite

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.9

2019→2023

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square injury rate improved

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square's TCR fell 9.9 from 9.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.9 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 165% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #214/403
  • PHOTO The Ben West Palm
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Ben West Palm (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square averages 4.9 TCR (165% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square TCR series: 2019=9.9 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #214 safest of 403 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in New York.

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square (51 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square
Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square (51 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Fairfield by Marriott New York Manhattan/Times Square has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.9 4.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NY · New York

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Ben West Palm 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4263-14690 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sales - Bali Hai Villas 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marriott Chicago Midway 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Absolut Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation at Allegany, LLC 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE RPH-East Memory Care Residences at Creekstone 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Artis Senior Living of Briarcliff Manor 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEW YORK 1_1558935 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Hotwire Communications - Orlando Warehouse 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2172 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Inmar - 4095 Lakeland 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2968 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE CPM - Crawfordsville 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fleet 1990 W. 500 So. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fey Printing 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maiden 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.