Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Colorado

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker

Aurora, CO · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade C.

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker safety composite

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker held a steady TCR band

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Aurora, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/308
  • PHOTO HRC HVO Sedona Pinio…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HRC HVO Sedona Pinion Pointe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 308 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Colorado.

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker
Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker (22 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Fairfield Inn & Suites Denver Aurora/ Parker has fewer employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CO · Aurora

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 497 employers in Aurora, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HRC HVO Sedona Pinion Pointe 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kimpton Hotel Born 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springhill Suites Houston Intercontinental AP 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chisos Mountain Lodge (Big Bend Resorts, L.L.C. dba) 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brannan Ready Mix Central 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cortez 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transport Service 60106 Denver 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE KMM Delivery Services Inc 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's Hospital Colorado 6,663 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Aurora_CO 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primoris Renewable Energy 1,695 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN5 1,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Open Gates FTD/ARTI 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE LKC CBTC Flushing 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0785 - Alexander City, Al 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0768 - Palmdale, Ca 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.