Electric Power Distribution · Minnesota

Faribault Service Center

Name: Faribault Service Center Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Faribault, MN · ~36 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 0.8
Avg TCR: 1.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Faribault Service Center runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric Power Distribution workplace, earning a grade B.

Faribault Service Center: 0.8 TCR = 65% of Electric Power Distribution BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Faribault Service Center safety composite

Faribault Service Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2020

Faribault Service Center injury rate improved

Faribault Service Center's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Faribault, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.8 · 65% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #5/85
PHOTO Licking Rural Electr…
BOOK 4y book
INJ 1 inj
SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Licking Rural Electricfication (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

0.8
Licking Rural

0.8
SE REG-WACO

0.8
AMEREN MISSOUR

0.8
St. Petersburg

0.8

What this shows Faribault Service Center averages 0.8 TCR (65% of the Electric Power Distribution BLS benchmark).

Faribault Service Center TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Faribault Service Center falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Distribution establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 85 Electric Power Distribution employers in Minnesota.

Faribault Service Center (36 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Faribault Service Center has fewer employees than the Electric Power Distribution median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	Injuries
2020	0.0	0
2019	0.0	0
2018	0.0	0
2017	3.1	1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MN · Faribault

2,958 Electric Power Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 92 employers in Faribault, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Licking Rural Electricfication	UTICA, OH	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	SE REG-WACO	WACO, TX	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	AMEREN MISSOURI - SEMO Division North	CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO	0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	St. Petersburg Complex	SAINT PETERSBURG, FL	0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Prairie Moon Nursery	WINONA	36 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Corteva Agriscience - Olivia MN R&D	OLIVIA	36 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Central Counties Cooperative Litchfield	LITCHFIELD	36 FTE
STATE-SIZE	2011-Stanton, MN (Monsanto Co.)	STANTON	36 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Faribault Plant	Faribault	736 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Minnesota Correctional Facility-Faribault	Faribault	633 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Daikin Applied South	Faribault	563 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Faribault Foods LLC	Faribault	452 FTE
NAT-TCR	Taylor Building	Freeport, ME	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Knapp's Development, Inc.	Prairie Du Chien, WI	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Toledo TO	Walbridge, OH	0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Effective Home Care LLC	Brooklyn, NY	0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Hobbs Service Center	Hobbs, NM	36 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Bakery Nouveau - West Seattle	Seattle, WA	36 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Ean Ito - 36l5/36n5/3634/36m5)	Hilo, HI	36 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Clinton Mi Store	Clinton Township, MI	36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.