ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY · Virginia

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu

Fredericksburg, VA · ~70 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu runs at 328% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY workplace, earning a grade F.

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu: 12.5 TCR = 328% of ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu safety composite

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.8

2017→2019

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu injury rate improved

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu's TCR fell 5.8 from 16.9 in 2017 to 11.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 16.9 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.9 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=11.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fredericksburg, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.5 · 328% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #150/199
  • PHOTO Gracemont Assisted L…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu averages 12.5 TCR (328% of the ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu TCR series: 2017=16.9 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=11.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu falls in its industry

6,510 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 199 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY employers in Virginia.

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu (70 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu
Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu (70 employees, TCR 12.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Fb-Hhh1-Spring Arbor Fredericksbu has more employees than the ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 11.1 8.3 8 0 0
2018 9.3 8.0 7 0 0
2017 16.9 4.2 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Fredericksburg

6,510 ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 279 employers in Fredericksburg, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gracemont Assisted Living and Memory Care 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone at Milford 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forest Heights Senior Living Community 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis Living Lake Union 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Leaf Medical of Virginia LLC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE H.L. Mooney Advanced Water Reclamation Facility 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monarc Construction, Inc. 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SCHOOLS 2,863 FTE
CITY-NEAR MARY WASHINGTON HOSPITAL 1,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR GERMANNA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 865 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brookdale Fredericksburg 848 FTE
NAT-TCR Terminix Service, Inc. Asheville NW 64- 40 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 294 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ybor City Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 12.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Holy Cross Health Center 12.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Co 23 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victoria Electric Cooperative, Inc 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hopkins Center 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1305 Walnut Street Corp 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.