Nursing homes · Connecticut

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall

Danbury, CT · ~159 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall: 11.1 TCR = 171% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall safety composite

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2021

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall injury rate improved

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall's TCR fell 2.3 from 9.9 in 2016 to 7.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 30.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.9 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=30.5 · 2021=7.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Danbury, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 11.1 · 171% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #156/258
  • PHOTO Willowbend Health & …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Willowbend Health & Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall averages 11.1 TCR (171% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall TCR series: 2016=9.9 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=30.5 · 2021=7.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #156 safest of 258 Nursing homes employers in Connecticut.

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall (159 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall
Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall (159 employees, TCR 11.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.6 6.5 6 1 0
2020 30.5 30.5 5 29 0
2019 6.7 6.7 8 0 0
2018 5.9 3.9 6 0 0
2017 6.3 6.3 7 0 0
2016 9.9 9.9 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CT · Danbury

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 171 employers in Danbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Willowbend Health & Rehabilitation 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brown Nursing Home, LLC 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR King Nursing & Rehabilitation Community 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harmony 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Windsor Marketing Group 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Aluminum 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emhart Teknologies LLC 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE EW MIDR2 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR DANBURY HOSPITAL INC. 2,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR Board of Education 2,209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western CT Medical Group 1,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Connecticut Medical Group 1,239 FTE
NAT-TCR Staab Construction Corporation 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ontario Facility 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercy Health Lima Allen County Paramedics 11.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Aperion Care Toluca 11.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ultratech, a Division of Veeco 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reasors19 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tuff Shed National Support Center 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5811-CITGO Corpus Christi 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.