Semiconductor devices manufacturing · California

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco

San Jose, CA · ~159 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Semiconductor devices manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco: 0.9 TCR = 27% of Semiconductor devices manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco safety composite

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2021

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco injury rate improved

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.1 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.9 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334413 · San Jose, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #57/128
  • PHOTO FUJIFILM DIMATIX
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~159 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FUJIFILM DIMATIX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ultratech, a Division of Veeco averages 0.9 TCR (27% of the Semiconductor devices manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco TCR series: 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.6 · 2019=0.9 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Ultratech, a Division of Veeco falls in its industry

437 Semiconductor devices manufact establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 128 Semiconductor devices manufact employers in California.

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco (159 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate Ultratech, a Division of Veeco
Ultratech, a Division of Veeco (159 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 216 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Ultratech, a Division of Veeco has fewer employees than the Semiconductor devices manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2018 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2017 1.1 1.1 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334413 · CA · San Jose

437 Semiconductor devices manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FUJIFILM DIMATIX 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ceres (Tower Drive) 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cobham Semiconductor Solutions - Colorado Springs 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CA2 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE REDDING SERVICE CENTER-OFFICE 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Solar4America Technology, Inc. 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santa Ana Creek Development dba Mark Company 159 FTE
STATE-SIZE JFShea Construction-Walnut 159 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR 20 Commerce Way Norton MA 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR HYVE OB Synnex 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR US097: N. Indiana-Elkhart 359 - SG 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR McAllen Office 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Filosa Care Center, Inc. d/b/a Hancock Hall 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reasors19 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tuff Shed National Support Center 159 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5811-CITGO Corpus Christi 159 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.