Residential construction, multifamily, general contractors · California

Fisher Development, Inc.

San Francisco, CA · ~42 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fisher Development, Inc. runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Residential construction, multifamily, general contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Fisher Development, Inc.: 1.9 TCR = 49% of Residential construction, multifamily, general contractors BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fisher Development, Inc. safety composite

Fisher Development, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2017→2022

Fisher Development, Inc. injury rate improved

Fisher Development, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.1 from 5.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.0 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236116 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/68
  • PHOTO Cobalt Construction …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cobalt Construction Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fisher Development, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fisher Development, Inc. averages 1.9 TCR (49% of the Residential construction, multifamily, general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fisher Development, Inc. TCR series: 2017=5.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=2 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Fisher Development, Inc. falls in its industry

410 Residential construction, mult establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 68 Residential construction, mult employers in California.

Fisher Development, Inc. (42 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Fisher Development, Inc.
Fisher Development, Inc. (42 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Fisher Development, Inc. has fewer employees than the Residential construction, multifamily, g median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.1 2.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236116 · CA · San Francisco

410 Residential construction, multifamily, general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cobalt Construction Company 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CBS Construction Services, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alpine Building 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Hills Apartments 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad H 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CJJ Farming, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connell Ranch 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Alcon Laboratories-Fort Worth 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trans Florida Development Corp 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wolkow Braker Roofing Corp. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Stryker Entellus 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carlisle Car & Tk d/b/a Highlands Tire 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland Parts Distribution Center 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mabank ISD* 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Susque-View 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.