wired telecommunication carriers · Florida

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001

Tampa, FL · ~383 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 runs at 137% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical wired telecommunication carriers workplace, earning a grade D.

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001: 1.0 TCR = 137% of wired telecommunication carriers BLS 0.7 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 safety composite

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2022→2024

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 injury rate improved

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.4 in 2022 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.4 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 1.0 · 137% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #10/40
  • PHOTO Breezeline - Johnstown
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~383 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Breezeline - Johnstown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 averages 1.0 TCR (137% of the wired telecommunication carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 TCR series: 2022=1.4 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 0.7

Where FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 falls in its industry

455 wired telecommunication carrie establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 40 wired telecommunication carrie employers in Florida.

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 (383 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001
FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 (383 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

FL_Tampa_3611 Queen Palm Dr_41301001 has fewer employees than the wired telecommunication carriers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.5 3 0 0
2023 0.8 0.5 3 0 0
2022 1.4 0.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · FL · Tampa

455 wired telecommunication carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Breezeline - Johnstown 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WI_Milwaukee_1320 N M.L. King, Jr._47000100 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR FTC Sumter Operations 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR OH_Columbus_1600 Dublin Rd_TWMH6DBL 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eastern Service Area 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3702 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 4260 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1536 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Truman L. Flatt & Sons Co., Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MPW Industrial Services, Inc. - Toyota Georgetown 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint Louis Crisis Nursery 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MPW Industrial Services, Inc. - Kenworth 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Montgomery DC 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willmar Grow Out 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Senate 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electroimpact Inc. 383 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.