Conservation and reclamation agencies · Arizona

Flagstaff Ranger District

Name: Flagstaff Ranger District Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Flagstaff, AZ · ~151 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 4.2
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flagstaff Ranger District runs at 132% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Conservation and reclamation agencies workplace, earning a grade D.

Flagstaff Ranger District: 4.2 TCR = 132% of Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flagstaff Ranger District safety composite

Flagstaff Ranger District scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 4.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers
DART rate: D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2022→2023

Flagstaff Ranger District injury rate improved

Flagstaff Ranger District's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.8 in 2022 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.8 · 2023=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Flagstaff, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 132% of ind

DART 2.1 DART
RANK #8/20
PHOTO EI052 - Brainerd Hea…
BOOK 2y book
INJ 15 inj
SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EI052 - Brainerd Headquarters (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Cowlitz County

4.3
Ramona Hall

4.3
Construction S

4.3
This site

4.2
EI052 - Braine

4.2

What this shows Flagstaff Ranger District averages 4.2 TCR (132% of the Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS benchmark).

Flagstaff Ranger District TCR series: 2022=4.8 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Flagstaff Ranger District falls in its industry

413 Conservation and reclamation a establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 20 Conservation and reclamation a employers in Arizona.

Flagstaff Ranger District (151 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Flagstaff Ranger District has more employees than the Conservation and reclamation agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	3.7	2.1	7	0	0
2022	4.8	1.4	8	2	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · AZ · Flagstaff

413 Conservation and reclamation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 181 employers in Flagstaff, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	EI052 - Brainerd Headquarters	BRAINERD, MN	4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Cowlitz County	KELSO, WA	4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Ramona Hall	LOS ANGELES, CA	4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Construction Services	VANCOUVER, WA	4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Cholla Power Plant	JOSEPH CITY	151 FTE
STATE-SIZE	IES Communications, LLC - Strategic Accounts	TEMPE	151 FTE
STATE-SIZE	European Techniques	PRESCOTT	151 FTE
STATE-SIZE	2295 LOWE S OF BUCKEYE AZ	BUCKEYE	151 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Northern Arizona University	Flagstaff	7,465 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Northern Arizona Healthcare	Flagstaff	4,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Coconino County Board of Supervisors	Flagstaff	1,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR	City of Flagstaff	Flagstaff	1,075 FTE
NAT-TCR	Atlanta manufacturing	Duluth, GA	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Land of Lincoln Goodwill Warehouse	Jacksonville, IL	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Casey Toyota	Williamsburg, VA	4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	Fairfield Inn and Suites Canton south	Canton, OH	4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Hines Precision Inc.	Philpot, KY	151 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Lion Elastomers Orange	Orange, TX	151 FTE
NAT-SIZE	AltaPointe Administration	Mobile, AL	151 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Nelson Jameson Inc - WI	Marshfield, WI	151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.