Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · Michigan

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp.

Flint, MI · ~57 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp.: 3.1 TCR = 58% of Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. safety composite

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp.: 0.0 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2018

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp.'s TCR rose 9.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 9.3 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336350 · Flint, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/61
  • PHOTO Magna Powertrain
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magna Powertrain (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. averages 3.1 TCR (58% of the Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=9.3 · BLS 5.4

Where Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. falls in its industry

320 Transmissions and parts, autom establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 61 Transmissions and parts, autom employers in Michigan.

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. (57 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp.
Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. (57 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 200 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Flint - KUKA Assembly and Test Corp. has fewer employees than the Transmissions and parts, automotive, tru median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 9.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336350 · MI · Flint

320 Transmissions and parts, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 260 employers in Flint, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magna Powertrain 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transmission Manufacturing Plant - Georgia 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ZF Chassis Systems-Duncan 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alabama Cullman Yutaka Technologies 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bloomingdale MI Facility 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville SC 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dickinson Homes 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Concraft Inc 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Flint Truck Assembly 5,164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Assembly 3,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hurley Medical Center 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Flint 2,477 FTE
NAT-TCR Card-Monroe Corp. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PCUD 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lexington Healthcare of La Grange 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CARE Center, Inc 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE School District of Abbotsford 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE BKL 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interim HealthCare of Spokane, Inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compassionate Care Hospice of Minneola 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.