Airport passenger screening security services · Michigan

Fnt Bishop International Airport

Flint, MI · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fnt Bishop International Airport runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Airport passenger screening security services workplace, earning a grade B.

Fnt Bishop International Airport: 2.5 TCR = 55% of Airport passenger screening security services BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fnt Bishop International Airport safety composite

Fnt Bishop International Airport scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Fnt Bishop International Airport held a steady TCR band

Fnt Bishop International Airport's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=9.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Flint, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/20
  • PHOTO AVMAC LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AVMAC LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Fnt Bishop International Airport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fnt Bishop International Airport averages 2.5 TCR (55% of the Airport passenger screening security services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fnt Bishop International Airport TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=9 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Fnt Bishop International Airport falls in its industry

992 Airport passenger screening se establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 20 Airport passenger screening se employers in Michigan.

Fnt Bishop International Airport (41 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fnt Bishop International Airport
Fnt Bishop International Airport (41 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Fnt Bishop International Airport has fewer employees than the Airport passenger screening security ser median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 9.0 9.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 10.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · MI · Flint

992 Airport passenger screening security services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 260 employers in Flint, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AVMAC LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Aviation - HBS Houston 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BNA NASHVILLE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ULTRA AViation Services 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Otsego 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ypsilanti Community Utilities Authority - Service Center 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zolman Restoration, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nugent Builders, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Flint Truck Assembly 5,164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Assembly 3,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hurley Medical Center 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Flint 2,477 FTE
NAT-TCR IBC Advanced Technologies Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Knoxville Tn - 215 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 274 - Grafton WI 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 800 Delta Dr Monroe La 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Office 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE AC Hotel Sunnyvale Cupertino 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primrose Retirement Community of Jefferson City 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Primrose of Washington 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.