Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · California

Fontenoy Engineering

San Francisco, CA · ~35 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fontenoy Engineering runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Fontenoy Engineering: 3.2 TCR = 114% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fontenoy Engineering safety composite

Fontenoy Engineering scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2024

Fontenoy Engineering injury rate improved

Fontenoy Engineering's TCR fell 3.1 from 3.1 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.1 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=9.7 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #103/201
  • PHOTO Auburn Constructors,…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Auburn Constructors, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fontenoy Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fontenoy Engineering averages 3.2 TCR (114% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fontenoy Engineering TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=3 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=9.7 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Fontenoy Engineering falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 201 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in California.

Fontenoy Engineering (35 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fontenoy Engineering
Fontenoy Engineering (35 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Fontenoy Engineering has fewer employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2020 9.7 6.5 3 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2018 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2017 3.1 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · San Francisco

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Auburn Constructors, LLC 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crawford Grading & Pipeline, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bedford Regional Water Authority 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR G.D. Nielson Construction, Inc. 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Lakeside Book Company - Harrisonburg North 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Technology Construction, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Crossroads Care Center of Kenosha 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR North Central Surgical Center, LLP 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE PJT 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koenig Equipment- Anna, OH 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hutcherson Construction LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lake George Escape 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.