Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Forest Pines

Name: Forest Pines Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Columbia, SC · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.0
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forest Pines runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Forest Pines: 2.0 TCR = 53% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forest Pines safety composite

Forest Pines scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): A 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Forest Pines held a steady TCR band

Forest Pines's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbia, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 53% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #9/107
PHOTO Washington Township …
BOOK 6y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Washington Township Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

2
Washington Tow

2
63106 SUNRISE

2
Merrill Garden

2
Oaks at Grove

2

What this shows Forest Pines averages 2.0 TCR (53% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Forest Pines TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=5.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Forest Pines falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Forest Pines (23 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Forest Pines has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	0.0	0.0	0
2021	0.0	0.0	0
2020	5.6	5.6	1
2019	0.0	0.0	0
2018	6.5	0.0	1
2017	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Columbia

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Washington Township Senior Living	SEWELL, NJ	2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	63106 SUNRISE OF GARDNER PARK	PEABODY, MA	2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Merrill Gardens at Wright Park	TACOMA, WA	2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Oaks at Grove Park	COLUMBUS, GA	2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE	TRI COUNTY COTTON GROWERS, LLC	SALTERS	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Hartsville Complex	HARTSVILLE	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Marlboro Electric Cooperative, Inc.	BENNETTSVILLE	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	BLYTHEWOOD CREW QUARTERS	BLYTHEWOOD	23 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Palmetto Health Richland	Columbia	5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Prisma Health Richland	Columbia	4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR	South Carolina Department of Transportation	Columbia	4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR	SC Department of Transportation	Columbia	3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR	Sodexo at National Aquarium Institute	Baltimore, MD	2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sodexo at Samford Univ Food Court	Birmingham, AL	2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Campbell Soup Supply Company LLC Stockton	Stockton, CA	2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR	Goodyear Rickenbacker LC. (SMRU80062)	Columbus, OH	2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Bridgeport Distribution	Tacoma, WA	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	MS-Cafe 37*	Redmond, WA	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	E Michigan U - SC Starbucks	Ypsilanti, MI	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Indiana Packers	Delphi, IN	23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.