Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Oaks at Grove Park

Columbus, GA · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oaks at Grove Park runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Oaks at Grove Park: 2.0 TCR = 53% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oaks at Grove Park safety composite

Oaks at Grove Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2019→2024

Oaks at Grove Park injury rate improved

Oaks at Grove Park's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Columbus, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/205
  • PHOTO Washington Township …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Washington Township Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Oaks at Grove Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oaks at Grove Park averages 2.0 TCR (53% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oaks at Grove Park TCR series: 2019=4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Oaks at Grove Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Oaks at Grove Park (34 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Oaks at Grove Park
Oaks at Grove Park (34 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Oaks at Grove Park has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Columbus

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 291 employers in Columbus, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Washington Township Senior Living 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63106 SUNRISE OF GARDNER PARK 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merrill Gardens at Wright Park 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Faye Wright Senior Living 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Total Timberland Services LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Business Office - 1001 Prince Ave. Athens 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Neese District Jackson EMC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE JACKSON EMC - NEESE 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST FRANCIS HEALTH LLC 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Columbus Midtown Hospital 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (Main Campus) 1,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul S Amos Campus 1,748 FTE
NAT-TCR Hajoca 718 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR South Beach Resort 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Advantage Label & Packaging, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Safford 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hajoca 575 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deep Coat Industries LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland, ME 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sands Construction 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.