Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Texas

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota

Navasota, TX · ~63 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota runs at 195% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade D.

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota: 6.4 TCR = 195% of Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota safety composite

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota: 2.5 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.75× in 2024

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota's TCR rose 8.7 from 2.5 in 2018 to 11.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Navasota, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 195% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #25/27
  • PHOTO Shannon Precision Fa…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shannon Precision Fastener - Auburn Hills (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota averages 6.4 TCR (195% of the Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota TCR series: 2018=2.5 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=10.4 · 2021=10.2 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=4 · 2024=11.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota falls in its industry

241 Hot forgings made from purchas establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 27 Hot forgings made from purchas employers in Texas.

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota (63 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota
Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota (63 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Forged Components, Inc. - Navasota has fewer employees than the Hot forgings made from purchased iron or median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.2 11.2 7 0 0
2023 4.0 4.0 3 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2021 10.2 10.2 6 0 0
2020 10.4 8.7 5 1 0
2019 5.1 5.1 4 0 0
2018 2.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · TX · Navasota

241 Hot forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 38 employers in Navasota, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shannon Precision Fastener - Auburn Hills 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR LTC ROLL & ENGINEERING 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATI Forged Products 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR New England Industreis 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Brazos Hatchery 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Radiation Detection Company 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Plainview PLA1 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Major Oak Power 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grant Prideco Navasota 366 FTE
CITY-NEAR STgenetics-Navasota 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ellwood Texas forge Navasota 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidSouth Electric Co-op 177 FTE
NAT-TCR Miller's Senior Living Community 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wheaton Sanitary District 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Works 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NILMNVentures 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Builders Concrete/Bakersfield 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE GME Sewell 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross Morgan & Co.-Corp 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bell Nursery - Monroe 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.