Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · California

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc.

Fresno, CA · ~49 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc. runs at 200% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc.: 4.2 TCR = 200% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc. safety composite

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc.: 2.4 → 6.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.55× in 2023

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc.'s TCR rose 4.1 from 2.4 in 2017 to 6.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 200% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #92/148
  • PHOTO Smith Power Products…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Smith Power Products Inc. (Sparks) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fork Lift Specialties, Inc. averages 4.2 TCR (200% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc. TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=6.5 · BLS 2.1

Where Fork Lift Specialties, Inc. falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #92 safest of 148 Commercial and industrial mach employers in California.

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc. (49 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fork Lift Specialties, Inc.
Fork Lift Specialties, Inc. (49 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Fork Lift Specialties, Inc. has more employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 6.5 6.5 3 0 0
2022 4.6 4.6 2 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2020 11.2 6.7 5 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2017 2.4 2.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · CA · Fresno

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Smith Power Products Inc. (Sparks) 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meldrum Mechanical Services 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hobart Service, Jacksonville 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ITT Goulds Pumps Inc. 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE LAJES FARMS INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunview Shandon 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rawah-Napa County 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Farms 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0576 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Chester Family YMCA 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Huntington Svc Ctr 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Nightingale Home Healthcare of Massachusetts, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Gallery of Art 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automated Door Ways Inc DBA Overhead Door Company of Columbus 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Groendyke Transport - Kansas City 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glebe 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.