Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Florida

Fort Walton District Office

Fort Walton Beach, FL · ~51 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fort Walton District Office runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Fort Walton District Office: 1.4 TCR = 113% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fort Walton District Office safety composite

Fort Walton District Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Fort Walton District Office: 0.0 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 4.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.5× in 2018

Fort Walton District Office's TCR rose 4.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Fort Walton Beach, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.4 · 113% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #33/43
  • PHOTO Tenaska Virginia Gen…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tenaska Virginia Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Fort Walton District Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fort Walton District Office averages 1.4 TCR (113% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fort Walton District Office TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Fort Walton District Office falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 43 Electric power generation, fos employers in Florida.

Fort Walton District Office (51 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fort Walton District Office
Fort Walton District Office (51 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Fort Walton District Office has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.1 2.0 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · FL · Fort Walton Beach

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 63 employers in Fort Walton Beach, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tenaska Virginia Generating Station 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Central Generation 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amos 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Panda Sherman Power, LLC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CGC Agri-Management Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillip Rucks Citrus Nursery, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Training Center 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pensacola Warehouse 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Fort Walton-Destin Hospital 1,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Walton Beach Medical Center 918 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 919 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR 919 417 FTE
NAT-TCR Deaver Ranch Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Elizabeth Detention 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR CI - El Paso TX 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR QSI-Montgomery 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #95 (Boise, ID (South)) 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #89 (Walla Walla, WA) 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #164 (Dubuque, IA) 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #134 (Pullman, WA) 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.